triumphalism: "excessive exultation over one's success or achievements (used especially in a political context)"
"an attitude or feeling of victory or superiority: as
a : the attitude that one religious creed is superior to all others
b : smug or boastful pride in the success or dominance of one's nation or ideology over others"
"late 14c., "success in battle, conquest," also "spiritual victory" and "a procession celebrating victory in war," from Old French triumphe (12c., Modern French triomphe), from Latin triumphus "an achievement, a success; celebratory procession for a victorious general or admiral,"
"from Old Latin triumpus, probably via Etruscan from Greek thriambos..."
But beneath the Trump-halism and the Hilary-Everestism:
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico: "As you have probably noticed, as more polls include my name and show us in double digits..."
"Not only is the news media taking TO Governor Weld [former Republican governor of Massachusetts] and me more, they are now talking ABOUT us more."
"And, of course, that is precisely what we need...the media, and voters, will take note of the fact that 15 percent puts us in the presidential and vice-presidential debates this fall...Being in the debates is a game-changer."
Even though this is impressive: two former conservative/libertarian governors running in the presidential election, what can it really achieve?
Will it throw an odd curve ball?
Could it possibly throw the election, like the infamous election of 1860?
Republican Party Abraham Lincoln 39.8%
Democratic Party Stephen A. Douglas 29.5%
Southern Democratic Party John C. Breckinridge 18.1%
Constitutional Party John Bell 12.6%
Who will benefit from the Johnson-Weld run, Clinton or Trump?
Or will the curve be split?
In the current 4-way race, NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll:
Libertarian Party Gary Johnson 10%
Green Party Jill Stein 6%
Democratic Party Hilary Clinton 39%
Republican Party Donald Trump 38%
Businessman Ross Perot in 1992 earned 18.9% but that was no cigar.
In the divided election of 1912,
Democratic Party Woodrow Wilson 41.8%
Bull Moose Party Theodore Roosevelt 27.4%
Republican Party William Howard Taft 23.2%
Socialist Party Eugene V. Debs 6%
Other Third Party Runs:
American Independent Party, Former Governor George Wallace 13.5%
& General Curtis LeMay
Republican Party Richard Nixon 43.4%
Democratic Party Hubert Humphrey 42.7%
Progressive Party Robert M. La Follette 16.6%
Independent Congress John B. Anderson 6.6%
Could the current election get such a severe split this time around, over 100 years later?
Unlikely, but then no one thought Trumphalism was going to defeat the usual standard bearers of the Republican Party in the Primaries.
But where in all of this rhetoric, propaganda, and multi-millions spent, is there any LIGHT?