Musings on Ultimate Reality, ethics, religion, social history, literature, media, and art
Showing posts with label clarity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clarity. Show all posts
Thursday, October 13, 2016
The Conundrum of Emphasizing What You Are NOT
Here's a baffling conundrum of modern society:
I have a complete lack of belief in
Islam,
but I don't emphasize that I am an A-Muslim (a- means "without").
I have a complete lack of belief in
Calvinist-Augustinianism
but I don't emphasize that I am an A-Calvinist-Augustinian!
So why do so many now
emphasize what they have a complete lack of belief in
Theism,
that they are A-theists?
It reminds me of a short reflection by the astronomer,
Neil deGrasse Tyson,
“You know, the only ‘ist’ I am, is a scientist.
“It’s odd that the word ‘atheist’ even exists. I don’t play golf.
Is there a word for non-golf-players?
Do non-golf players gather and strategize?
Do non-skiers have a word and come together
and talk about the fact that they don’t ski?”
Atheists are now claiming that all human infants are Atheists at birth.
And I might add, are all infants at birth
A-Golfers, A-Skiers;-), etc.?
Huh?
Thanks, Kurt V.
In Light-hearted satire against this weird Trumpped world,
Daniel Wilcox
Labels:
A-Golfers,
A-Muslims,
atheists,
baffling,
clarity,
Friends,
infants,
isms,
Nontheism,
Reason,
reflection,
satire,
semantics,
skepticism,
word-meaning confusion
Friday, January 15, 2016
Part #2: What Is Clarity of the Mind?
Continuing with the series, Purity of Mind and Heart:
#1: Use reason to clarify your worldview, when making major decisions, and in opposing what is false, wrong, and destructive.
Steer clear of informal and logical fallacies.
#2 Keep in mind that sometimes the term fallacy can even be used as a fallacy! For example, it has often happened in “appeal to authority.” An individual states 98% of plumbers in the U.S. think that such and such pipe is more reliable than…Or most philosophers think that…
And a person who disagrees says, “Oh, that’s just an appeal to authority—Fallacy!"
Nope. Showing that most authorities in their field support a view--the consensus--isn’t a fallacy, that’s evidence.
The fallacy, “appeal to authority” is when you argue most ministers, or most people in the U.S., believe that evolution is false. That is an error in authority because whether or not evolution is true or false is a subject for biologists to study and present evidence for one way or the other (97% of scientists say evolution is a fact).
Whether or not not most ministers, or most of the public, oppose evolution as false is not significant because they aren't scientists!
#3 Though carefully thought out reasoning is the watch-word, It’s okay, (even sometimes needed or necessary), to make intuitive jumps. Scientists and other thinkers often use intuition including famous ones such as Albert Einstein. Remember his comment about how imagination is more important than knowledge.
When making intuitive leaps, however, make sure it’s not near a cliff;-).
If you’ve been studying a project or issue in depth and haven’t solved the problem, then taking a break, even sleeping on it may help. One scientist actually made an important discovery in a dream.
However, if you are about to try out a new parachute, launch a rocket, get married, or change worldviews, it behooves you to double check your sudden intuitive insight with some careful thinking and evidence.
#4 When thinking through an ethical problem, be careful about semantic confusion, simplistic terms, and confirmation bias. Take a look at Peanuts:
And consider another example of confirmation bias, semantic confusion, and simplistic term-iteness:
"I'm pro-life! Strongly against abortion. We stand with America and our troops. Remember what our Christian leader said, God's gift to America
is the atom bomb."
Huh?
In the Light of Reason,
Daniel Wilcox
#1: Use reason to clarify your worldview, when making major decisions, and in opposing what is false, wrong, and destructive.
Steer clear of informal and logical fallacies.
#2 Keep in mind that sometimes the term fallacy can even be used as a fallacy! For example, it has often happened in “appeal to authority.” An individual states 98% of plumbers in the U.S. think that such and such pipe is more reliable than…Or most philosophers think that…
And a person who disagrees says, “Oh, that’s just an appeal to authority—Fallacy!"
Nope. Showing that most authorities in their field support a view--the consensus--isn’t a fallacy, that’s evidence.
The fallacy, “appeal to authority” is when you argue most ministers, or most people in the U.S., believe that evolution is false. That is an error in authority because whether or not evolution is true or false is a subject for biologists to study and present evidence for one way or the other (97% of scientists say evolution is a fact).
Whether or not not most ministers, or most of the public, oppose evolution as false is not significant because they aren't scientists!
#3 Though carefully thought out reasoning is the watch-word, It’s okay, (even sometimes needed or necessary), to make intuitive jumps. Scientists and other thinkers often use intuition including famous ones such as Albert Einstein. Remember his comment about how imagination is more important than knowledge.
When making intuitive leaps, however, make sure it’s not near a cliff;-).
If you’ve been studying a project or issue in depth and haven’t solved the problem, then taking a break, even sleeping on it may help. One scientist actually made an important discovery in a dream.
However, if you are about to try out a new parachute, launch a rocket, get married, or change worldviews, it behooves you to double check your sudden intuitive insight with some careful thinking and evidence.
#4 When thinking through an ethical problem, be careful about semantic confusion, simplistic terms, and confirmation bias. Take a look at Peanuts:
And consider another example of confirmation bias, semantic confusion, and simplistic term-iteness:
"I'm pro-life! Strongly against abortion. We stand with America and our troops. Remember what our Christian leader said, God's gift to America
is the atom bomb."
Huh?
In the Light of Reason,
Daniel Wilcox
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Inclusive or Exclusive?
"It is true that I have tried to make sure applicants understood that the Society of Friends they want to join is at its heart a Christian movement, but I DO NOT believe that retaining or recovering our Christian focus is a matter of policing who can join our meetings. Our spiritual clarity will not come from defending our "borders" with the outside world, but from affirming our Center from within."
Brooklyn Quaker
This Friend speaks to our condition. His statement reminds me of Thomas Kelly's comments in A Testament of Devotion and The Eternal Promise and
the many words of the Good News beginning in the New Testament that God is love and does not wish anyone to perish.
Brooklyn Quaker
This Friend speaks to our condition. His statement reminds me of Thomas Kelly's comments in A Testament of Devotion and The Eternal Promise and
the many words of the Good News beginning in the New Testament that God is love and does not wish anyone to perish.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



