IRAN: A MODERN HISTORY by Historian Abbas Amanat
A few months back, I had only a superficial modern media-based understanding of Iran.
Based on misinformation from the past, I had thought Iran/Persia had had a great history before modern times. One very different from the current fanatical Islamic dictatorship.
Iran's worst troubles seemed to have come about because of the revolution against the Shah and the U.S. in 1979 and the previous overthrow of the democratically elected government of Iran by the U.S. CIA in 1953 which had put the current Shah in power.
But in this deep, biographically detailed, suspenseful, reflective history by the brilliant scholar Abbas Amanat, I quickly learned that these modern events were but a horrific continuation of hundreds of years of immoral and unjust actions by religious and secular Iranian leaders.
And that often Iran has suffered repeated invasions, manipulations, destructions, and slaughters by other nations.
The U.S. overthrow of the Iranian government in 1953 was only the latest in hundreds of years of destructive actions by other nations against Iran. By far the worst invasions of foreign powers were the attacks covering several hundred years by the British Empire and Czarist Russia.
Also, tragically, like so many nations in history, Iran's dictatorial leaders often lived in arrogant, self-centered opulence, extravagant glut, and were guilty of vicious actions oppressing the poor illiterate masses, leveling oppressive taxes on farmers, etc.
While outwardly the aristocratic leaders claimed to adhere to Shia Islam, strongly supporting the fanatical mullahs in their persecution and executing of Iranians, the leaders actually lived degenerate, evil lives contrary to what any civilized human would do.
Even dictators who accomplished much that was good for average Iranians were sociopathic in their behaviors. For example after the Great War, Reza Shah came to power (1925-1941), restricted the oppression of Islamic mullahs, modernized the crimial code and economics of the nation.
But he was very paranoid like Stalin of the Soviet Union, cruel, and draconian in his actions to make Iran a modern secular society. One might call him a secular mullah.
HOWEVER, despite these hundreds of years of civil wars, oppressions, persecutions, small movments for justice, compassion, and human rights sometimes managed to arise. One of the most exciting, inspiring movements was the democratic one before the Great War!
IF only modern Iranians could overcome the present oppressive theocracy of the mullahs and begin again plans for a democratic, human-rights based society.
IF you have any interest in the Middle East and its complex history, don't miss this tour de force.
Best history I have read since The Great Upheaval: America and the Birth of the Modern World--1788-1800 by the historian Jay Winik.
from Amazon blurb: "Political history is the driving narrative force, given impetus by Amanat's decades of research and study. He layers the book with discussions of literature, music, and the arts; ideology and religion; economy and society; and cultural identity and heritage."
©2017 Yale University (P)2018 Tantor
In the Light of Goodness, Truth, and Justice,
Dan Wilcox
Musings on Ultimate Reality, ethics, religion, social history, literature, media, and art
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 4, 2023
Wednesday, October 3, 2018
STEPPING BACK FROM CERTAINTY: remembering we are finite, seeking what is true
Have you noticed that most of the voices currently shouting for their side (which ever one it is) seem to think they know for sure and that the other side is completely wrong?
As has happened endlessly in history past, leaders of today are forgetting that they are finite humans seeking what is true, but instead claim to know and that anyone who disagrees with them is________ (fill in the demeaned name-calling).
A few words from a brilliant character in Michael Crichton's book, Timeline, would seem good to reflect about and muse on by everyone today:
"The present is like a coral island that sticks above the water, but is built upon millions of dead corals under the surface...in the same way, our everyday world is built upon millions and millions of events and decisions that occurred in the past."
This is why confirmation bias and hostility are so present often in Republicans versus Democrats, Theists versus Atheists, Capitalists versus Socialists, and so on. Each opposing human's view of reality is partially shaped by his/her perceptional view from his/her particular coral reef.
Of course the Timeline quote is hyperbole, overstatement. Our Pasts--whether liberal or conservative, religious or non-religious don't define us completely.
We rational primates have the ability to advance, to make creative new choices, to advance closer to reality.
Most humans can choose to step back and question their presuppositions, their own understandings based upon their own worldview and life-stance which came about in the past,
BUT
it ain't easy.
If in doubt, look at how few of us are doing so.
So, let us PAUSE, and study again what we are stating, promoting, in all of these current philosophical and political conflagrations.
1. Are we aware how much of our past is leading us to hold to one position, rather than engaging in careful rational thought about it?
2. Are we remembering to be civil and courteous with those with whom we strongly disagree?
3. Are we open to new thoughts, new perspectives on these contentious arguments?
4. Do we seek to view the best arguments of our enemies with careful consideration?
5. Are we always seeking to be aware of our own confirmation bias?
6. Do we demonstrate benevolence toward those whose views we strongly, rightly, oppose?
Seek what is true,
Daniel Wilcox
Labels:
accusation,
assault,
atheist,
certainty,
completely,
conservative,
Criminal Justice,
Democrat,
Ethics,
fair,
finite,
injustice,
liberal,
Michael Crichton,
morality,
name-calling,
Republican,
theist,
true
Saturday, December 3, 2016
Those Who Forget the Central Cause of Past Wrongs...
What Americans are forgetting in their current debacle of political, religious, and social name-calling are these words:
Labels:
atheist,
bad,
capitalist,
Christian,
Clinton,
conservative,
debacle,
Democratic,
evangelical,
Evil,
good,
human rights,
justice,
left-wing,
liberal,
name-calling,
Republican,
right-wing,
socialist,
Trump
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
The Revenge of the Politically Incorrect: Don Trumphalism
triumphalism: "excessive exultation over one's success or achievements (used especially in a political context)"
"an attitude or feeling of victory or superiority: as
a : the attitude that one religious creed is superior to all others
b : smug or boastful pride in the success or dominance of one's nation or ideology over others"
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
triumph:
"late 14c., "success in battle, conquest," also "spiritual victory" and "a procession celebrating victory in war," from Old French triumphe (12c., Modern French triomphe), from Latin triumphus "an achievement, a success; celebratory procession for a victorious general or admiral,"
"from Old Latin triumpus, probably via Etruscan from Greek thriambos..."
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=triumph
But beneath the Trump-halism and the Hilary-Everestism:
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico: "As you have probably noticed, as more polls include my name and show us in double digits..."
"Not only is the news media taking TO Governor Weld [former Republican governor of Massachusetts] and me more, they are now talking ABOUT us more."
"And, of course, that is precisely what we need...the media, and voters, will take note of the fact that 15 percent puts us in the presidential and vice-presidential debates this fall...Being in the debates is a game-changer."
Even though this is impressive: two former conservative/libertarian governors running in the presidential election, what can it really achieve?
Will it throw an odd curve ball?
Could it possibly throw the election, like the infamous election of 1860?
Republican Party Abraham Lincoln 39.8%
Democratic Party Stephen A. Douglas 29.5%
Southern Democratic Party John C. Breckinridge 18.1%
Constitutional Party John Bell 12.6%
--
Who will benefit from the Johnson-Weld run, Clinton or Trump?
Or will the curve be split?
In the current 4-way race, NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll:
Libertarian Party Gary Johnson 10%
Green Party Jill Stein 6%
Democratic Party Hilary Clinton 39%
Republican Party Donald Trump 38%
--
Businessman Ross Perot in 1992 earned 18.9% but that was no cigar.
--
In the divided election of 1912,
Democratic Party Woodrow Wilson 41.8%
Bull Moose Party Theodore Roosevelt 27.4%
Republican Party William Howard Taft 23.2%
Socialist Party Eugene V. Debs 6%
--
Other Third Party Runs:
1968:
American Independent Party, Former Governor George Wallace 13.5%
& General Curtis LeMay
Republican Party Richard Nixon 43.4%
Democratic Party Hubert Humphrey 42.7%
--
1924:
Progressive Party Robert M. La Follette 16.6%
--
1980:
Independent Congress John B. Anderson 6.6%
--
Could the current election get such a severe split this time around, over 100 years later?
Unlikely, but then no one thought Trumphalism was going to defeat the usual standard bearers of the Republican Party in the Primaries.
But where in all of this rhetoric, propaganda, and multi-millions spent, is there any LIGHT?
Daniel Wilcox
"an attitude or feeling of victory or superiority: as
a : the attitude that one religious creed is superior to all others
b : smug or boastful pride in the success or dominance of one's nation or ideology over others"
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
triumph:
"late 14c., "success in battle, conquest," also "spiritual victory" and "a procession celebrating victory in war," from Old French triumphe (12c., Modern French triomphe), from Latin triumphus "an achievement, a success; celebratory procession for a victorious general or admiral,"
"from Old Latin triumpus, probably via Etruscan from Greek thriambos..."
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=triumph
But beneath the Trump-halism and the Hilary-Everestism:
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson, former governor of New Mexico: "As you have probably noticed, as more polls include my name and show us in double digits..."
"Not only is the news media taking TO Governor Weld [former Republican governor of Massachusetts] and me more, they are now talking ABOUT us more."
"And, of course, that is precisely what we need...the media, and voters, will take note of the fact that 15 percent puts us in the presidential and vice-presidential debates this fall...Being in the debates is a game-changer."
Even though this is impressive: two former conservative/libertarian governors running in the presidential election, what can it really achieve?
Will it throw an odd curve ball?
Could it possibly throw the election, like the infamous election of 1860?
Republican Party Abraham Lincoln 39.8%
Democratic Party Stephen A. Douglas 29.5%
Southern Democratic Party John C. Breckinridge 18.1%
Constitutional Party John Bell 12.6%
--
Who will benefit from the Johnson-Weld run, Clinton or Trump?
Or will the curve be split?
In the current 4-way race, NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll:
Libertarian Party Gary Johnson 10%
Green Party Jill Stein 6%
Democratic Party Hilary Clinton 39%
Republican Party Donald Trump 38%
--
Businessman Ross Perot in 1992 earned 18.9% but that was no cigar.
--
In the divided election of 1912,
Democratic Party Woodrow Wilson 41.8%
Bull Moose Party Theodore Roosevelt 27.4%
Republican Party William Howard Taft 23.2%
Socialist Party Eugene V. Debs 6%
--
Other Third Party Runs:
1968:
American Independent Party, Former Governor George Wallace 13.5%
& General Curtis LeMay
Republican Party Richard Nixon 43.4%
Democratic Party Hubert Humphrey 42.7%
--
1924:
Progressive Party Robert M. La Follette 16.6%
--
1980:
Independent Congress John B. Anderson 6.6%
--
Could the current election get such a severe split this time around, over 100 years later?
Unlikely, but then no one thought Trumphalism was going to defeat the usual standard bearers of the Republican Party in the Primaries.
But where in all of this rhetoric, propaganda, and multi-millions spent, is there any LIGHT?
Daniel Wilcox
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)