EQUALITY NOT EQUITY

DEFINITION: "The terms equality and equity are often used interchangeably; however, they differ in important ways. Equality is typically defined as treating everyone the same and giving everyone access to the same opportunities. Meanwhile, equity refers to proportional representation (by race, class, gender, etc.)"
Winston-Salem State University

Equality is true and ought to always be lived by, but “equity” as popularly promoted at present isn't good or true. That certain groups, or races, or classes ought to be given special privilege and individuals who because of their class, or race, or group ought to be denied equality--that is wrong. It is a denial of classic liberalism to treat individuals primarily as part of a group, class, and race.

Too often that leads to inequality, injustice, misuse, abuse, unfairness, even divisive division, propaganda, Marxist actions, even hatred, false labeling of all individuals of a certain group or class or race as bad.

Heck, even though I began working and demonstrating against racial injustice long ago back in 1965 and though I support marriage for same sexual couples, etc., recently I was verbally attacked as being of “white supremacy” and of being “homophobic”!

Why?! Because I happen to belong to the white race, and am of the grouping that supports the nuclear family.

BLM and other such organizations (on the extreme left and the extreme right) instead of focusing on individuals, their inherent worth, their differences, etc., view society as competing groups. Two of BLM’s founders claim to be “Marxists.”

Contrary to the drum-beating of equity, the standards, for instance, for admission to a college ought to be the same for everyone!

To give preferential treatment to an individual who happens to be Black or poor or a woman or from a bad neighborhood is to treat him not as an individual but as primarily part of a race, a group, a class, a gender/sex.

This the sort of political propaganda that focuses on—blaming the current major society for the ills of the minority (even though those ills come from a variety of sources, including some of the individuals and their wrong choices within that grouping, besides racism, etc.).

However, this is not to say, that disadvantaged young adults ought not to be helped. Injustice in the past, immoral actions of the past, and so forth ought to be righted now.

BUT the way they ought to be helped isn’t by disadvantaging individuals who happen to belong to other groupings--white or Asian or middle class or male or from a stable, civil neighborhood.

There ought to be equal standards for all—equality.

Then beyond that equality--not disadvantaging a person just because he is white or Asian-- the government and society can still make additional efforts, plans, etc. to help those who have grown up disadvantaged.

For instance, instead of quotas, special privileges, or giving lower standards for individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds, those individuals who can’t meet the requirements can be given extra tutoring, extra help in getting tools such as computers, etc.

That way everyone is treated equally, but those who because of social and cultural injustice, poor circumstances, or abusive background, etc. are given extra help to meet and achieve the same standards.

Hopefully, balancing equality with extra help for those in need will help achieve the good, true, and just.

In the Light, Dan Wilcox

Wise Words on Social Justice

The future is an infinite succession of presents, and to live now
as we think human beings should live,
in defiance of all
that is bad around us,
is itself
a marvelous
victory.
--Howard Zinn

In the Light,

Daniel Wilcox

"Talk Is Cheap"

Triple Play: 3 Insightful Books on Jesus Every Seeker Needs to Read

Who is Jesus? Overwhelmed by the confusions and contradictions and divisiveness of the religious world? Why can't we get along since many of us claim to know the source of truth and justice and peace? Wondering what historians have to say about Jesus and Christianity? Interested in scholarly history of ancient times narrated with lucidity and suspense?

Then try this triple play of well-written historical studies on Jesus and disagreeing early Christian groups--how followers, politicians, and the general populace saw, interpreted, and/or distorted the Messiah.

#1 How Jesus Became God by Bart D. Ehrman

One of the finest books on Christianity and its central tenets ever! Ehrman’s most powerful and exciting powerhouse—lucid, insightful, perceptive, balanced, and personable.

The book explains complicated history and deciphers difficult theology and shows how creedal dogma developed in the Christian religion.

What's also great about this book, is that Ehrman doesn't seem to have any particular ideological axe to grind (unlike so many books on religion, harshly pro or con, including several of Ehrman's own previous works which were sometimes abrasive). His voice in How Jesus Became God is balanced, and he seeks to be fair and objective in his historical analysis.

A brilliant scholar, textural critic, and religious commentator, the author is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Ehrman is a former evangelical Christian who now describes himself as an agnostic who admires and seeks to follow Jesus' ethical truths. Every penny earned by his blog goes to support charities who "fight poverty, hunger, and homelessness."

http://www.amazon.com/How-Jesus-Became-God-Exaltation/dp/0061778184/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1397232171&sr=8-1&keywords=how+jesus+became+god

#2 Jesus Wars by John Philip Jenkins

Very powerful historical/theological/political study of Christendom from 200 CE to 600 CE. Even though the history, politics, and theology are complex and so very many church and empire leaders are involved in all the convoluted, theoretical controversies and battles, Jenkins lucidly brings us through to the end.

Then he explains, how all the intolerance, torturing, and slaughtering of Christians by Christians was much worse than the later Roman Catholic Inquisition. Christians killed each other in the name of Jesus fighting over one letter's difference in two words--"homoios (similar) versus homos (same) when it came to the nature of Jesus.

Jenkins is Distinguished Professor of History at Baylor University, formerly Edwin Erie Sparks Professor of Humanities at Penn State University. He is an Episcopalian Christian.

http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Wars-Patriarchs-Emperors-Christians/dp/0061768936


#3 When Jesus Became God by Richard E. Rubenstein

While Erhman's book covers several hundred years from Jesus's life to the Nicene Creed, Rubenstein's book focuses solely on the Council of Nicaea and related historical events in the 4th century. When Jesus Became God is a good follow up study and continuation of How.

Rubenstein presents a somewhat balanced historical treatment of the conflicts of opposing Christianities at the time of Nicene in the Christendom of the Roman Empire under the Emperor Constantine. A reader will learn much, about the tragic details of the caustic conflict and warring of Christians against each other, against Jewish people, and against Pagans.

The author is Professor of Conflict Resolution and Public Affairs at George Mason University, has degrees from Harvard College, Oxford University (a Rhodes Scholar), and Harvard Law School. Rubenstein is Jewish and active in promoting peace, equality, and social justice.

http://www.amazon.com/When-Jesus-Became-God-Christianity/dp/0156013150/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1397233268&sr=1-2&keywords=when+jesus+became+god


Too bad there isn't a 4th base in baseball;-), because I would actually like to recommend another historical book (The Human Christ by Charlotte Allen, which is a study of the "quest for the historical Jesus").

Now that I think of it, there's also a 5th, and a 6th--later, so many great books of learning from the many tomes I've waded through in 50 years of reading:-)

In the Light,

Daniel Wilcox